|
|
 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company (alternate)
|
| In lugnet.general, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: -snip- Disagree, and offer a more simple letter instead: "Dear LEGO: Changing basic colors that have been around for many years was a very foolish thing to do. Please, PLEASE don't do anything that (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) Bingo! Thanks Steve. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) Disagree - because I can NOT pretend to know how to run a multi-billion(?) dollar company that has existed longer than I have. Steve Hassenplug (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Why Technic Pin 1/2 (part #4274) blue ?
|
| (...) I completely agree with Jennifer's statement, we like the colours when it suits us, but not when it doesn't. Unlike bley, I think this is a problem that only creeps slowly into the minds of technic builders as we can slowly deplete our stocks (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.parts, lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) The end of this para should read: "That's because LUGNET doesn't censor." (hit send too early, sorry!) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
|
