To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.db.scansOpen lugnet.db.scans in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Database / Scans / 88
    Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Richard Marchetti
   Hey y'all and especially Kevin: If I am wrong as to some very important particular issue here, just disregard the following... ...but why don't we, or Kevin, bring the BrickShelf scans current to the present date? Its my understanding that Lego is (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
   
        Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Tony Kilaras
      Richard Marchetti wrote in message ... (...) disregard (...) get a (...) care; (...) making (...) Exactly. If Lego has a problem they will let it be known. At the very least, how about some 1998 scans? www.brickshelf.com still says no scans after (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
   
        Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Kevin Loch
   (...) The original purpose of the scans archive was as an historical archive. (...) It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves. (...) I'm not opposed to having current sets but the current policy stands unless TLC offers (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
   
        Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Richard Marchetti
     (...) Forgive me if my memory is faulty -- but I thought it was you, Kevin, who interpreted a statement of Brad Justus' to mean that up to the present/current scans were okay. I think it was stated in one of those tedious threads about the Huw (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
   
        Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Richard Marchetti
     (...) You should trade the work back to them for $500K in bulk ordered specialty parts -- and then share it with all of us member lugnuts. In all honesty, it would be fair... -- Richard (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
   
        Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present? —Suzanne D. Rich
   Kevin Loch wrote: [...] (...) For the record Kevin, I strongly respect your position on this. -Suz. (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR