Subject:
|
Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.scans
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Mar 2000 20:44:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1868 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.scans, Kevin Loch writes:
> It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves.
You should trade the work back to them for $500K in bulk ordered specialty
parts -- and then share it with all of us member lugnuts. In all honesty, it
would be fair...
-- Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
| (...) The original purpose of the scans archive was as an historical archive. (...) It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves. (...) I'm not opposed to having current sets but the current policy stands unless TLC offers (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
