 | | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote: [...] (...) For the record Kevin, I strongly respect your position on this. -Suz. (26 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) You should trade the work back to them for $500K in bulk ordered specialty parts -- and then share it with all of us member lugnuts. In all honesty, it would be fair... -- Richard (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) Forgive me if my memory is faulty -- but I thought it was you, Kevin, who interpreted a statement of Brad Justus' to mean that up to the present/current scans were okay. I think it was stated in one of those tedious threads about the Huw (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) The original purpose of the scans archive was as an historical archive. (...) It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves. (...) I'm not opposed to having current sets but the current policy stands unless TLC offers (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Richard Marchetti wrote in message ... (...) disregard (...) get a (...) care; (...) making (...) Exactly. If Lego has a problem they will let it be known. At the very least, how about some 1998 scans? www.brickshelf.com still says no scans after (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Hey y'all and especially Kevin: If I am wrong as to some very important particular issue here, just disregard the following... ...but why don't we, or Kevin, bring the BrickShelf scans current to the present date? Its my understanding that Lego is (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
(...) I can't save them in Word95/6.0 format since it doesn't support vertical aligned text in table cells, but you can open them with Word97, since there is no format differences between them, as far as I know. I updated CD labels with a more (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
I don't have MS Word 2000, but the files open fine. Ryan (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
Any chance you can convert them to Word95 or Word97? Many of us won't have Word2000. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
I've just uploaded some CD jewel case designs for custom CDs made for Lego related (instructions and catalogs) scans (many of us burn them for ourselves, don't we?) to the brickshelf gallery. They all are in MS Word 2000 format. You can also find (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.db.scans)
|
