 | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
| (...) that part (and it's name) come from partsref - we try to use partsref names whenever we can, unless it's for a part that isn't available as a dat yet. But even for X numbers (our custom parts), we will eventually rename them to whatever the (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
| (...) Hey, don't go blaming poor Partsref for something that's an LDraw problem. ;) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
| "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:Gw0027.A1p@lugnet.com... (...) You mean ldraw, perhaps, as someone else pointed out? (...) so (...) That's basically what I was after - "common sense" names (keywords) for commonly sought-after (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
| (...) doh, you're right. Everyone, please don't complain to Steve about the names in Partsref, just complain to Steve about the names in LDraw :P <G,D&R> (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| |
