 | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
|
I like the idea of better indexing, and would be happy to incorporate any new method into peeron - now someone just has to write it :) I know that indexing by a non-unique field (which is the part number) is a bad thing - it's just the easiest and (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
|
Currently, there are three active major part databases out there: Partsref, Peeron Inventories, and the BrickLink Catalog. All have their advantages: Partsref has keywords, cross-referencing to other databases, and usually excellent pictures[1]. (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Going nuts trying to identify a part! (redux)
|
|
(...) BrickLink catalog, added last month by Brett Antaya and spokane1 (Jonathan McKay?). And with luck the inventory of Slave I will be available tomorrow. . . TWS Garrison Remove caps to reply (24 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Going nuts trying to identify a part! (redux)
|
|
(...) Actually, I don't even recognize the parts. My knowledge of 2001--2002 parts is minimal---I think I have fewer than a dozen open sets from those years. ---...--- TWS Garrison tgarriso@math.purdue.edu (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Going nuts trying to identify a part! (redux)
|
|
(...) You do recognize the part itself, yes? I know the numbers aren't canon yet--but the geometry of the piece (4x4 base to 2x4 top, last brick height toes in at 45-deg, with 2x2 hollow studs and two one- finger click hinge bits) I hope is clear. I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
