 | | newly scanned/dig-photographed: c83usts
|
|
I have just located an old 1983 catalog at a friends house (c83usts, in VERY GOOD SHAPE, a few barely noticible creases) I took hi-quality pictures of all the pages, including both covers with a digital camera, with 1280x1024 fine jpg compression (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | 5542 Black Thunder
|
|
Part #s gotten from (URL) - Black Thunder Total pieces = 483 Total Piece Count = 485 (not incl stickers/instructions) Individual Element Count = Box Piece Count = None listed Cnt Part# Color Name, Description --- ----- ---...--- ---...--- 2 4033 (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Inventory: 5117 Compressor Pump, "Service" Theme, Technic System
|
|
Set 5117 - Compressor Pump Set Year: 1995 (at least that is the copyright date) Manual Piece Count: 8 Piece Count on Box: 7 Description Source: (URL) or (URL) Source: (URL) Note: no literature is included in this set. Qty Color PartID Description -- (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | 6437 Beach Buggy, City Center Theme, Lego System
|
|
Set 6437 - Beach Buggy Set Year: 1999 Manual Piece Count: 30 Piece Count on Box: 27 Distinct Piece Count: 36 Description Source: (URL) and/or (URL) Source: (URL) indicates part does not count toward total ? indicates I made up the description Qty (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote: [...] (...) For the record Kevin, I strongly respect your position on this. -Suz. (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) You should trade the work back to them for $500K in bulk ordered specialty parts -- and then share it with all of us member lugnuts. In all honesty, it would be fair... -- Richard (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) Forgive me if my memory is faulty -- but I thought it was you, Kevin, who interpreted a statement of Brad Justus' to mean that up to the present/current scans were okay. I think it was stated in one of those tedious threads about the Huw (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) The original purpose of the scans archive was as an historical archive. (...) It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves. (...) I'm not opposed to having current sets but the current policy stands unless TLC offers (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Richard Marchetti wrote in message ... (...) disregard (...) get a (...) care; (...) making (...) Exactly. If Lego has a problem they will let it be known. At the very least, how about some 1998 scans? www.brickshelf.com still says no scans after (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Hey y'all and especially Kevin: If I am wrong as to some very important particular issue here, just disregard the following... ...but why don't we, or Kevin, bring the BrickShelf scans current to the present date? Its my understanding that Lego is (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
