Subject:
|
Re: Not wanting to start rumors, but
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:39:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2127 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Christian Treczoks wrote:
> "Heiner" from 1000steine mentioned in the discussion that the
> Sandcrawler([TM] or whatever) sports a different kind/hue of tan.
>
> Can anybody confirm/deny this? Or is this just an additional colour
> instead of a replacement? Or ist this a mistake on Heiners side?
>
> LEGO has been dumb enought to pull such a stunt before and shown how
> little they care for their customers - and I don't want to be bitten
> again in the middle of a large-scale project. So I thought I'd ask
> before I spend my money on a few tenthousand bricks in a colour that may
> or may not be available in a few months...
>
> concerned, Christian
More likely a new color. Or probably Cool Yellow.
Tan, known inside TLG as Beige, has been locked.
See here: <http://news.lugnet.com/lego/?n=2605>
I shure hope TLG is smart enuff to not pull off such a silly trick again.
scott Frischmann.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Not wanting to start rumors, but
|
| Scott Frischmann wrote: > More likely a new color. Or probably Cool Yellow. I thought they already had more than enough surplus colours? (...) Well, several people tried to get Jake or whomever at Lego to confirm that the mentioned "Beige" is indeed (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.color)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Not wanting to start rumors, but
|
| "Heiner" from 1000steine mentioned in the discussion that the Sandcrawler([TM] or whatever) sports a different kind/hue of tan. Can anybody confirm/deny this? Or is this just an additional colour instead of a replacement? Or ist this a mistake on (...) (19 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.color)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
