To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.colorOpen lugnet.color in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Color / *169 (-10)
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) Jake, I have said nothing on the color issue so far. I do not have a big collection, so it will not affect me that much personally. And I am sorry that you've been given so much grief over this matter. However, please convey this reality check (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) - snip - (...) Or of course that you don't understand Lego's customers but are rather assuming they are all like you. Jeff (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) Thanks Jake for giving us the full story. I am in the camp that appreciates your diligence and suffering to bring the truth to the AFOL community. Whether I agree or disagree (cough disagree cough) with LEGO's choice, I think you've done a (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
As someone who has run into situations like this in business before, I can understand the situation. It's hard to make changes that are necessary to improve the product due to the impact on existing customers. Where Lego missed the boat on this (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) I think "organically" in this context means that the broadening of the color palette was not guided by a deliberate, structured plan and was instead allowed to grow to suit the needs that arose over time. Dave! (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
Jake, Thanks for working on getting this info, but... (...) Detail, please - exactly which way do you mean "organically" here? It can have more than one meaning, one which is {very good} for anyone building realistic displays. (...) There is a TON (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) Yep, typo. Making messages without spell/grammer ccheckk will do that to you. (Yes, I know. It's intentional.) Have Fun! C-ya! Rich (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) Rich, I have to pick on you, buddy ;-) Above, you say 'inciteful [1].' I can't tell if that was a genuine typo, or if you meant it as a reference to how any official posts about the color issue incite harsh posts against the company and the (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
(...) Ok Folks, It's been a long time since I've been flamed (quick check to my behind to see if 3rd deg burns have sufficiently healed over... yup), so I guess it's time to get my fanny fried again. Jake, thank you for the explaination. I at least (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
 
  Re: Color Change background
 
In lugnet.lego, Jake McKee wrote: (snip) (...) It's good enough for me. Thanks for explaining the matter throughly, Jake. Pedro (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR