Subject:
|
Re: Characters for CW
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 03:17:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
601 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Wilson Raska writes:
> Looking throught Castle World today, I noticed there have been quite a few new
> characters added. I was wondering, is this page only for sig-figs, or is it
> for all characters? Here's the page for a reference:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/castle_world_temp/characters.html
>
> If it *is* for all characters, I think it could maybe use a little more
> structure. Like on the Creatures page:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/castle_world_temp/creatures.html
>
> by listing the characters under the balladeer's name they belong to. I think
> this would help organize things better. Any comments?
>
> Wilson
Hmmm...not a bad idea Wilson. It is for all characters, yes. I do think it's
getting a tad disarrayed. Since I'll be handing the reigns back over to Shiri
when she gets back (this weekend!) I'll see what she has to say. But I'm all
for doing it like the Creature page. I'm wondering if we could keep the
current layout (divided into classes) as well as subdivide them by balladeer
(or vice versa, divided by balladeer then into classes)... Anyone else wanna
toss 2 cents in?
-Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Characters for CW
|
| I would definetly agree that the character page could use some work, but as far as organizing it, here is my idea. I like the idea of organizing by classes, but i would then have a little tab further down the line saying who the creator is, rather (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | Re: Characters for CW
|
| (...) OK, well... I'm not back into everything full-swing, but here are a few basic thoughts. I saw some preliminary stuff that Dave E has been working on, and it looks very good. On-the-fly generated (I think that's what you call 'em) lists of (...) (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Characters for CW
|
| Looking throught Castle World today, I noticed there have been quite a few new characters added. I was wondering, is this page only for sig-figs, or is it for all characters? Here's the page for a reference: (URL) it *is* for all characters, I think (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
