 | | Re: FBTB II —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | (...) No Bryan, you miss the points. #1) LUGNET is supposed to be for adult fans of LEGO. #2) We do not suffer trolls lightly, and the inflamitory statements you originally made were classic trolling. #3) If you really didn't want anyone to respond (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FBTB II —Nick Cameron
|
| | | | (...) The LUGNET homepage says "LUGNET is home to thousands of LEGO fans of all ages. We are a community which never sleeps — and has been called "the friendliest place on the Internet.". It says ALL AGES. Does all ages mean there is some two year (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Age of lugnetters (was Re: FBTB II) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) Possibly, but don't assume that there aren't younger ones. My sittees love the lugnet guide and they are only seven and a half. I would not dare let them go into the off-topic.debate section though, people feel a lot more freely about using (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Age of lugnetters (was Re: FBTB II) —Rose Regner
|
| | | | | | Membership does not require you to post on LUGNET. We have four card carrying members in our family. Ages 38, 35, 5 and 18 months. My sons look at stuff on here periodically and I assume they will post here when they learn to spell. Rose "Shiri (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FBTB II —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) That may be correct - but on the other hand, everyone here on LUGNET is expected to behave in a mature, adult manner regardless of their actual age. Was the poster under discussion behaving in such a manner? J (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
