|
|
 | | Re: Pitchfork Question (for Mike Stanley?)
|
| (...) I'll jump in on this one. For me, pitchforks are one of the pieces I don't necessarily need in greater quantity, but would like to have them available should I want more. I have a handful which is sufficient for any project I have yet (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Lego Web page
|
| A while back, I posted my web site out here on Lugnet, (URL) hardly received any response to my posting except for people yelling at me and pointing me to the "fair play rules" on Lego.com. Worse than that, someone EVEN thought that they would take (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Pitchfork Question (for Mike Stanley?)
|
| (...) This is a great question! If I had unlimited access to pitchforks I would be able to have a peasant uprising! I mean, having peasants decide to uprise against the local majistrate with swords and shields is a little hokey, but pitchforks, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Lego Web page
|
| (...) I for one appreciated your web sight! You have the details in the e-mail I sent you. And I do believe that we agree about should be done with those who ‘assume’ to know trademark law or copyright infringement, and thus act upon their (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Lego Web page
|
| (...) Brian, Let's look at your posts: (URL) what I can see, it got a double highlight and 14 messages. Your other post also got double highlights: (URL) and had 24 messages. If you ask around, that is very good. So what seems to be the problem ... (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
