|
|
 | | Re: OK, this one's for Shiri...it's SURVEY TIME!!!
|
| (...) 37 (almost 38) (...) I've got only and mostly Fright Knights sofar and a couple Dragon Masters sets, so I go for the FK (for solong) but will change probably in the (hopefully) near future... (...) No, not yet (...) Witch's Manor (own) Black (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| (...) Actually, I was thinking of Adult Haters Of Lego (AHOLs). Phonetically, I think it is rather descriptive, don't you? BEEP, BEEP, BEEP... Whoops! My LUGNET language warning sensor is going off. Better end this post! ;-) Steve Martin (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| (...) mark, you're a genius! ROFLMAO!! they are an evil lot and have been dubbed! (...) i've heard people remark,"lego(s) sure have changed since i was a kid."? i always smile and say, "no, that's just it; they have'nt." (...) i think that's why my (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| (...) If you change that to Adult Despisers of Lego Fans, you've got ADOLFS, a more accurate/descriptive acronym. (...) I've gotten that comment a lot too (oddly, from people who casually collect Lego). Friends who normal think lego is far to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| (...) Huh. I haven't gotten any of those. I have gotten plenty of people that don't understand, or give the kind of condescending "oh, isn't that nice" response. The latter is infuriating to me, and I just stop discussing it with them and move on to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| (...) ADOLS ~ Adult Despisers Of LEGO... scary to think that for every one of us, there is one of them! i've met people who think my passion for lego is an _absolute_ waste of my time and talent and are disgusted by the amount of $ i spend on it. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions.
|
| (...) This post really should be in the Castle World newsgroup(1), and I have posted follow-ups there. Administration and ideas relating to the running of Castle World really should not be posted here in the Castle group. Jeff (Removes the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | | | An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions.
|
| I apologize that my CW question began to spin off into a comic book discussion. You know how things go. That has been moved to the off topic debate area however and now I would like to restate my theory on CW and once again ask for feedback: Hello (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| Anthony, I looked at your site, and I thought it was neat. It isn't the most stimulating, beautiful, or anything like that, but it is yours, and I think you did a great job. I'm frankly surprised mine wasn't nominated! Scott S. -- Systems (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| I don't really understand why your site is the "Awful Site of the Day." What makes it so awful? That it's Lego? I also don't understand why someone would write you just to insult your site, but I suppose there are jerks everywhere. Personally, I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
