|
|
 | | Re: This is cool!
|
| I was unaware of the vast number of people out there who do not like legos one bit. I've gotten hundreds of messages telling me my site sucks. But don't worry though, I've not ratted any of you out, I've taken one for the team. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| I don't really understand why your site is the "Awful Site of the Day." What makes it so awful? That it's Lego? I also don't understand why someone would write you just to insult your site, but I suppose there are jerks everywhere. Personally, I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: This is cool!
|
| Anthony, I looked at your site, and I thought it was neat. It isn't the most stimulating, beautiful, or anything like that, but it is yours, and I think you did a great job. I'm frankly surprised mine wasn't nominated! Scott S. -- Systems (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions.
|
| I apologize that my CW question began to spin off into a comic book discussion. You know how things go. That has been moved to the off topic debate area however and now I would like to restate my theory on CW and once again ask for feedback: Hello (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions.
|
| (...) This post really should be in the Castle World newsgroup(1), and I have posted follow-ups there. Administration and ideas relating to the running of Castle World really should not be posted here in the Castle group. Jeff (Removes the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
