Subject:
|
Re: Favorite theme (...it's SURVEY TIME!!!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:01:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1384 times
|
| |
|
|
> Just for laughs, I totaled up the answers. Broad answers ("pre-DM") were
> ignored as too vague, "ranked in order" only counted the first, split answers
> got a percentage of 1 vote. I did not try to interpret if Dark Forest and
> Forestmen should be lumped together or if Black Falcons and Black Knights
> should be either (I still don't perceive the difference between the last two).
IMO, I'd say that Dark Forest and Forestmen lump together, but Black Falcons
and Black Knights do not. Look at the shields. I dunno if that's a very
accurate way of doing it, but FM and DF both have the same style shield, and
BF do not have the same design as BK. If anything, I'd say BK have closer
ties to DM; perhaps the Dragon Masters were an attempted revival of the
series, with a fresh look. My 2 cents.
-Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Favorite theme (...it's SURVEY TIME!!!)
|
| (...) two). (...) Idunno. I like the minifigs a little better in the Dark Forest series better than the Forestmen, but I suppose they are nothing more than Forestmen II. Was there a series actually called "Black Falcons"? Black Falcon's fortress, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Favorite theme (...it's SURVEY TIME!!!)
|
| (...) Just for laughs, I totaled up the answers. Broad answers ("pre-DM") were ignored as too vague, "ranked in order" only counted the first, split answers got a percentage of 1 vote. I did not try to interpret if Dark Forest and Forestmen should (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
