 | | Re: Finally, a new story! —Wilson Raska
| | | | Wow! Thanks for the overwhelming response from you guys. The spells were really fun to do, and it was kind of a challenge making some of 'em, but I think they turned out pretty good. The widescreen idea just came to me when I was doing the second (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Finally, a new story! —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | (...) Basilisks have wings? ~Mark (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Finally, a new story! —David Goeb
| | | | | (...) Yeah, but you call it a cockatrace If wing'ed I think. Some thing like that, they are the same creature. Sometimes listed as male and female forms of the same "Beast". Altho I am not so sure I have read they can just take both forms or pick (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Finally, a new story! —Wilson Raska
| | | | | | (...) I actually don't know if they have wings, building them might not even work out, but either way, I'm calling it a Basilisk. It sounds cooler. And yes, I did check, they are pretty much the same beast. Wilson (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Finally, a new story! —John Radtke
| | | | | (...) I think it's cockatrice but it, like most any mythological creature, has been subject to much creative license over the millenia. I tend to picture (maybe from my D&D days) the cockatrice as a winged bird-like creature and the basilisk as (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | |
