 | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup! —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | (...) I do understand what you are trying to say, I just don't see your logic as compelling in any way. (...) to (...) I've said a number of times this isn't about whether it sucks or doesn't suck. You said it isn't real Castles - that's all I'm (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup! —Mike Stanley
| | | | | (...) Really? Wow. (...) Oh, ok. Well, like someone reminded me - you're entitled to your opinion. You're wrong, of course, but you're certainly entitled to to be wrong if you want to be. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup! —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Gosh, now I'm really impressed. Golly gee. (...) suck. (...) And....that's it? Not willing or simply unable to defend your opinion? Just a sneering dismissal? Perhaps you shouldn't be calling people "doofus", if that's the best you can muster. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | |
