Subject:
|
Re: Did they have paint?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:13:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
468 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bryan Wong writes
> Did they have paint back in the medieval ages?
I think so.. IIRC some pigments were in greater supply than others though.
> I'm thinking of making a gray building for example, but parts of the wall will
> have red "bricks" exposed. I don't think that would be correct for that time
> period though... Right?
Well, I know that Stirling Castle, Scotland had golden-yellow daubing on the
walls, partly protection for the stone, partly decoration.. so you could have a
building that was yellow with grey stones revealed. But hey - it's LEGO - you
make up the rules! :)
Ie. if you can think of a medieval-tech reason for a pigment (clay can be grey
or red?), then you can do it. I have heard that the medieval period was
generally more coloured and gaudy then you'd think from looking at the odd damp
grey castle.
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Did they have paint?
|
| (...) I just found a reference to Royal Purple paint first being used in Egypt in 1600 BC at (URL) at other references, it is clear that paint is a very early invention (the Lascaux cave paintings for example). (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Did they have paint?
|
| Hi, Did they have paint back in the medieval ages? I'm thinking of making a gray building for example, but parts of the wall will have red "bricks" exposed. I don't think that would be correct for that time period though... Right? Bryan (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
