 | | Re: Lego direct for castle ... —Steve Bliss
| | | | [x-post and FUT lugnet.general] (...) It's interesting. When writing about the historical way TLC has ignored AFOLs, people tend to make two rants: 1. There aren't enough AFOLs to make a financial impact on TLC. 2. TLC won't offer direct parts (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego direct for castle ... —Dan Boger
| | | | | | On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:26:46 GMT Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote concerning 'Re: Lego direct for castle ...': (...) heh, that's a very good point, and I think you're right. The two positions are mutually exclusive. IMO, AFOLs do not (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego direct for castle ... —Frank Filz
| | | | | (...) Something else which always bugs me is the assumption that TLC will "lose" money with Lego Direct. If they price the parts correctly, and do a good job on the distribution system, I believe they can sell them for less than the per piece cost (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
