Subject:
|
Re: [CW] More suggestions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:50:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
949 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
> (Hey, Pawel, thanks for clearing that stuff up. I didn't *think* I was way off
> base but it's kind of nice to know for sure.)
>
> Now I'm going to ramble on with a few more suggestions to see what, if
> anything,
> sounds good.
>
> First off, CW posts...there might be some weird folks that don't want to see
> the CW discussion or related stuff, so I think we ought to put [CW] in the
> subject line. (I think most of us are doing this already but I wanted to
> mention it anyway.)
>
> Second is something I want to call 'Feudalism in Castle World'. Basically,
> it's the idea that people (with all proper permissions) ought to be able to
> place Structures and Characters in each other's Realms. An example would be
> if Jeff Stembel decided he really liked the stuff I was doing with the Dragon
> Clan, and wanted to do a Dragon Clan fortress in my mountains, overseen by a
> baron who owes fealty to the current King. Another one would be the Red Fox's
> home (coming soon) and for that matter the Wolf's tower (coming not soon).
> Both of these guys are wizards (I promise, I'll eventually do something other
> than wizards!) and I really don't want to create an entire Kingdom around each
> of them because right now, for the stuff I have planned for them, the kingdom
> isn't really that important. So the best thing for me would be to let someone
> else do the work of making the kingdom, and then have my Structures in there.
>
> Anyway, the point is that this sort of thing would increase interaction and
> hopefully cooperation between CW members.
>
> There are a couple of ways we could do this. One would be the actual feudal
> method - someone could 'give' a portion of their realm (probably expressed in
> baseplates) to someone else. Another would be for the two people involved to
> just hash out the details and then send mails to P&C saying 'put this structure
> in Person A's lands' and 'it's OK to put Person B's structure in my lands'.
> Actually, they both amount to the same way, it's just the first is more formal
> and probably involved more work on P&Cs part.
>
> I think I had a third but my fiancee is taking me out to breakfast so it'll
> have to wait.
>
> J
>
> --
> sakura@mediaone.net is Jeff Johnston http://www.io.com/~jeffj
> My LEGO Web page has moved! Go to: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/sakura
> Check out my Trade List and Want List - * - Last Updated 12/19/1999
> LEGO Geek Code: SP+ CA +++ (375/6075) PI +++ #++ S--/++ LS++ Hal M+ A++ YB73m
thank you! this feudal system will certainly have to happen! ...and as
easily as you describe! this will also enable fellow balladeers to
contribute to growing empires and large kingdoms such as the one j. stembel
is planning. so far, his is the only one i'm aware of, but CW simply
wouldn't be complete with them!
also placing (CW) in post headers to relevent posts is not only a good
suggestion, but should be a "rule of thumb" out of respect for todd &
lugnet. (this is of course, until he gives us lugnet.castle.world!
...perhaps after he map is online, and we've begun "moving in", he will!)
believe you me, this can't happen soon enough for me, either! thank you
for your continued patience and invaluable contributions, all. the sooner i
get this preliminary work done, and the sooner i can become a fellow
balladeer (nothing more), the HAPPIER i will be.
later ~ craig~
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [CW] More suggestions
|
| (...) :-) Always is... (...) Right. Although I don't know of anyone ignoring CW, I'm sure that some people might be avoiding it... (...) Soory for interrupting - Why should you apologize? Whatever you do is good enough, we're not gonna ban you just (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | [CW] More suggestions
|
| (Hey, Pawel, thanks for clearing that stuff up. I didn't *think* I was way off base but it's kind of nice to know for sure.) Now I'm going to ramble on with a few more suggestions to see what, if anything, sounds good. First off, CW posts...there (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
