To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 2169
    Facial Expressions .. —Pawel Nazarewicz
   Some more testing along the lines suggested: (URL) might have potential in the future, no? (of course the arrow has to go, but other than that I'm pleased). I do see the use of such techinques though (winking, eyes closed, etc... ) -- pn (24 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Facial Expressions .. —Shiri Dori
   (...) It most certainly does! Thanks, Bill, for the fabulous idea! (...) LOL! That arrow isn't the most realistic one I've ever seen ;-) but otherwise it looks really good. (...) We can finally have some unchronic-happy guys! Yay! -Shiri (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Facial Expressions .. —Steve Bliss
   (...) We've got *plenty* of unchronic-happy guys. A few girls, too. I think the yellow-happy-smiley-faces are a great thing about mini-figures. Grumble, grumble, curmudgeonly whinge. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Facial Expressions .. —Shiri Dori
   (...) Whoops. I meant faces that are chronically-happy or chronically-mad, etc. (...) Yeah, not that they aren't - it's just nice to have some space to improvise with them. (...) ;-) -Shiri (URL) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Facial Expressions .. —Steve Bliss
   (...) Oh, well, that's different. Never mind. :) Steve (24 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR