Subject:
|
Re: New castle line
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:43:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9041 times
|
| |
| |
|
--snip--
* Undead? This seems a little different from legos normal family policy...
--snip--
Any other views? ; )
Nathan
|
Hi Nathan,
I have to say I have a really hard time seeing how the undead differ in any way
from Legos family policy. It seems you are equating the family policy of a
small minority of religious groups with general family policy.
Usually I would let this slide especially since you have expressed most of it as
a personal view but the way you phrase that seems to imply that you want your
concept of a family policy to be what Lego follows. I find this dangerous and
want to make it clear in the unlikely event that someone from Lego reads this
that I do not consider this remotely close to my own opinions.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: New castle line
|
| (...) Sorry, thought that the 'my other complaints are' disclaimer made it clear that these were my views... I assume that by 'small minority of religious groups' you mean me ; ) Personally it doesn't cross my family policy (not sure if I have one). (...) (18 years ago, 1-Jan-07, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New castle line
|
| (...) Well now I have an excuse to rant about the new castle line ; ) I really don't like the direction Lego is going in. Besides the obvious (bley) my other complaints are: Undead? This seems a little different from lego's normal family policy... (...) (18 years ago, 31-Dec-06, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|