Subject:
|
Re: New castle line
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:55:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jimmy Park wrote:
| |
I’m actually pretty saddened that an entire new castle line is introduced and
Lugnet doesn’t have a single post on it, whereas there are pages of stuff
elsewhere. Geez, what happened to this forum?
|
Well now I have an excuse to rant about the new castle line ; )
I really don’t like the direction Lego is going in. Besides the obvious (bley)
my other complaints are:
- Undead? This seems a little different from lego’s normal family policy...
- Far too fantasy based (I know a lot of people like this, just not me).
- Corny ‘evil-good’ story line.
- Can’t comment on the buildings.. yet...
- Still dragons (and accompanying bionicle junk).
Any other views? ; )
Nathan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New castle line
|
| (...) Hi Nathan, I have to say I have a really hard time seeing how the undead differ in any way from Lego's family policy. It seems you are equating the family policy of a small minority of religious groups with general family policy. Usually I (...) (18 years ago, 1-Jan-07, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New castle line
|
| I'm actually pretty saddened that an entire new castle line is introduced and Lugnet doesn't have a single post on it, whereas there are pages of stuff elsewhere. Geez, what happened to this forum? (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.castle)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
