Subject:
|
Re: Great Tower
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:49:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2264 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, James Brink wrote:
| |
| |
Excellent detailing throughout! You also made very good use of the
rock-patterned wall panels- just enough to add some variation but not
overwhelming.
|
Thanks!
| |
I think you missed the “could be a set” goal for this
particular alphabet project model, but it’s certainly beautiful.
|
Yeah, this and the executioner are not really “set” creations. That’s why I
qualified the “set” goal with *most* :) I had to do some sort of great
tower/keep, which doesn’t lend itself to being an actual set.
James
|
Excellent build, James. Lovely details, lots of fun.
I was agreeing with the ‘couldn’t be a set’ reasoning, and then I thought ‘Why
not?’ What .castler, or kid who is into castles, wouldn’t want this set?(1) No,
it wouldn’t be a big seller, but I bet it could match the ISD for sales. How
does it compare in parts count? (rough, ballpark figure...) That kind of
dreaming big is something I think that LEGO needs. Think of the press they could
get with that. Think of the playability....
Peace and big dreams,
Professor Whateverly
(1) in classic gray of course.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Great Tower
|
| (...) Thanks! (...) Yeah, this and the executioner are not really "set" creations. That's why I qualified the "set" goal with *most* :) I had to do some sort of great tower/keep, which doesn't lend itself to being an actual set. James (20 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
