 | | Re: The Law of Falling Lego —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | (...) Not to mention the rooves of buildings. ;) Jeff (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Law of Falling Lego —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Not to mention the roofs...<runnning> >;-) -John (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —David Carriker
|
| | | | (...) hoof -> hooves roof -> rooves (???) OR roof -> roofs hoof -> hoofs (???) Ahhhhhh..... That's english for ya' :) -David (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —Ian Warfield
|
| | | | | (...) But it *can* be spelled hoofs, as in "huffs" or "hoooffs". In fact I've seen it spelled that way more often than the other way. But I don't like it when people say "ruffs". -- Ian (Incidentally, does anyone here say "tomahto"?) :P (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) FTR, I made a mistake. I checked the dictionary, and rooves is not a plural form of roof. :) Ahhh... I love English. ;) Jeff (24 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
