To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 17638
17637  |  17639
Subject: 
Re: Green Dragon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:42:15 GMT
Viewed: 
512 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Matt Hein wrote:
   In lugnet.castle, Leonard Hoffman wrote:

   call it a work in progress. current plans for improvement include: 1. creating a body (expanding the link where the arms are) to include legs which will support the weight

Your first priority will of course be the most difficult, since the entire weight of the model will be exerted on those legs (assuming the arms are crossed or in a fighting position). I’ll just theorize on this and guess that a system of multiple hinges for each joint would help to alleviate the stress, but a problem would lie in its execution (hinges stacked on each other will not fold properly.) A solution may involve using 1/2 stud offsets, but then the shape begins to seriously distort.

well, matt thanks for the feedback. however, i wasn’t planning on using traditional hinges, or on stacking them. i used click hinges and places them side to side.. with joints at the hips, knees, and ankles.

the biggest problem is not the wieght of it, but the distribution of the weight. the tail offsets the head okay, but each tends to fall on its own weight (ie, the weight of various links in the tail pulls it down and ruins the balancing between head and tail).

I wanted the arms to be open for posing. and either way, with my new hand design, i really can’t use them to help it stand anyway. the legs hold the weight best, and otherwise it is the balance of head vs. tail that make the thing work or not.

ideas for a stronger joint than click hinge (but still small enough) would be best. altho i think i may get some from eric sophie at brickfest :)

   This particular part may prove useful though.

   2. give it a light grey underbelly

3. give it a finished tail

4. wings

5 If you’re not aiming for a mechanized design, try at all costs to attribute an ‘organic’ look to the design. Also, take some consideration into attaching a number of fins or other accentuations for your aesthetic license.

does it look particularly un-organic to you? i thought the slopes kinda gave a hint of a rough, angular body that i imagine a dragon would have. is this idea not conveyed?

i mean, did it look like i might be trying for a mechanized design?

fins? the pictures i’ve posted already feature ‘horns’ - do you mean something else? i’ve done a series of 1x1 cones, but i really don’t like the look. am thinking about what else to do, or if it is even important at all.

-lenny



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Green Dragon
 
(...) Your first priority will of course be the most difficult, since the entire weight of the model will be exerted on those legs (assuming the arms are crossed or in a fighting position). I'll just theorize on this and guess that a system of (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR