 | | historical accuracy re. factions —Magnus Lauglo
|
| | | Hi all, Just a quick question for you other medieval military historians out there. I think most people's lego medieval armies I have seen are made up of a bunch of factions, each of which is armed with a variety of weapons. My army is no exception, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: historical accuracy re. factions —James Stacey
|
| | | | | "Magnus Lauglo" <thunder_road@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H3CuC6.2uv@lugnet.com... (...) there. (...) missile (...) But (...) knights, (...) they (...) areas (...) or (...) Different uniforms for different factions tends to be a bit further (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: historical accuracy re. factions —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | In lugnet.castle, Magnus Lauglo writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Hmm. Well, certainly larger armies were using combined arms strategies as far back as the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, etc. So by the time of the Middle Ages, any good miltary (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: historical accuracy re. factions —Magnus Lauglo
|
| | | | | | Thanks for your Hendo-Babble, very interesting. (Thanks James Stacey also for your comments). I understand that in the early and high middle ages, most of the infantry might only wear some simple armour (or none) and not really have much in the way (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: historical accuracy re. factions —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) It all depends on the society in question. There were national preferences on weapons, in part from tradition, in part from imposition from on high (as in further up the feudal ladder). Over time, the English gravitated towards the longbow and (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
