Subject:
|
Re: Flora's Crown (as seen in #5837)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 03:52:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
731 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Leah Cardaci writes:
> > Are you referring to the tiara under the clear dome, and not the crown Flora
> > is wearing?
>
> Twisted! This is the exact opposite of how it looks in the S@H catalogue.
> But yeah, this image shows the tiara "under glass":
> http://img.lugnet.com/display.cgi?set/new/upload/5826-1-956458771.jpg
Ah, that explains the confusion.
> > If so it is actually a trans green element, not painted. It attaches by a
> > peg approximately the same size as those on the bottom of feathers and would
> > fit in anything that would hold a large feather. You can see it in better
> > detail here: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=37557.
>
> You are the ****, Baby!
Heh, thanks.
> > The part came in at least one other belville set #5826 The Queen's Chamber
> > where it also appears in trans red. (http://guide.lugnet.com/set/5826)
>
> Is it me, or does the image actually show a trans-green tiara? Are there
> two tiaras in that set? I am looking at this:
> http://img.lugnet.com/display.cgi?set/new/upload/5826-1-956458771.jpg
IIRC, that set has two trans green and two trans red tiaras. I know it at
least has one of each color.
-L
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Flora's Crown (as seen in #5837)
|
| (...) Twisted! This is the exact opposite of how it looks in the S@H catalogue. But yeah, this image shows the tiara "under glass": (URL) If so it is actually a trans green element, not painted. It attaches by a (...) two tiaras in that set? I am (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
