 | | Re: Introducing Garalt!
|
| (...) one- it seems like perhaps you used smaller images so that there wasn't quite as much work to do the fading/panning effects. It's not like the older one was really bad or anything, but it did have noticeable slowdowns. In case you care, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Introducing Garalt!
|
| (...) <snipage> (...) I was fortunate enough to view both movies on the network at school. I didn't have to worry too much about lag-time or too much else, except no sound... :( The one thing I have to say is that there were no pics of "New" Garalt. (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Introducing Garalt!
|
| (...) Thanks much, glad you liked it! Yeah, I used much smaller pictures, though admittedly not on purpose. I did however shrink the size of the overall movie with processor and download speeds in mind. Fortunately for everyone else though, this (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Introducing Garalt!
|
| (...) I hope someday you get the chance to listen to the music, it's really an awesome pair of songs. Perhaps you could save the flash files to disk and take them to a computer that could view them with sound. (...) Well, since it was meant to be an (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Introducing Garalt!
|
| (...) Not in my books. That was cool. You should illistrated your prolouge in a flash movie. Split it into three or four bits and you've got it! (...) Jeremy Scott (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
