 | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer! —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) TLC really needs to figure out why their pages are getting caught up by web caches. From two different machines at work, I see two different US catalogs, one with the new sets, one without. Unfortuanately, the machine which sees the new sets (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer! —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | Is there any date on this set being available??? I'm saving my change for an army of these guys!!! (24 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer! —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, most likely, FBOFW, their server isn't probably requesting that the pages not be cached. Let's see what's returned over HTTP: ---...--- % telnet www.lego.com 80 Trying 171.20.249.10... Connected to lego.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I think that last is perhaps a little unlikely. I'm not sure exactly what the infrastructure of our network here at IBM is, but I strongly doubt there is anything Microsoft between my RS/6000 and www.lego.com. I just did a little bit of (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Oops, I was confused as to which system showed the old catalog, and now it is showing the new catalog. The machine which was showing the old catalog is one of our central servers, still an RS/6000 though. At this point, I would have to say that it (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
