 | | Re: Review of Knights Kngdom sets 6026, 6094 and 6095
|
| (...) The only reason for any of these sets to enter my collection was to make 6091 (6098) larger and more complete. Add all that stuff to 6090 (x2) and I am on my way to being content with the new castle line. Needs more bowmen and kings men and (...) (25 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Review of Knights Kngdom sets
|
| <snip (...) <snip> I can see someone else noticed the inconsistancy from the box to the instructions. It would be nice if we (AFOL) had some clarification on the set number. You want a review? Of the castle? Ok.. you talked me into it. When I found (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
| |
