 | | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091) —Dan McNeally
|
| | | (...) I agree. Although 6085 comes close. Dan (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Hard to include 6085 without including 6080.. they're almost exactly the same structure, just different colors... they even put the jail cell in the same corner of the castle! As far as 6090 being the best though, I don't know... I've always (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091) —Dan McNeally
|
| | | | | (...) IMHO I think that 6085 looks better. The black gives it a dark moodiness. (...) pool, (...) I did'nt like how the back wall was so I put a tower on it. It is a bit weak on defence and soldiers. (...) modular! (...) whole (...) laid (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091) —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) 6081 King's Mountain Fortress is a baseplate castle, but it had attachment points for the other modular castle sets from that era... J (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well, yes and no... It DID have a connection point, BUT it only had ONE connection point (the left hand side looking at it straight on) so you couldn't create an enclosed wall... The other thing is that the battlements on that side are (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
