|
|
 | | Re: Vikings vs Castle?
|
| Hi Ben, (...) I always wondered why Ninja is a subgroup of Castle, too. But from what I know, changes in the Newsgroup tree and re-sorting grown groups is a potential No-No from the technical and organizational point of view. Probably, to change (...) (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle?
|
| (...) I agree that Vikings are their own theme. But Ninja is also it's own independant theme and not a subgroup of Castle. It was marketed in the catalogs with the Ninja logo while Dark Forest and Fright Knights were marketed under the Castle (...) (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle?
|
| (...) Hi Hendo, Please see this thread for further information: (URL) Godt! René (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Vikings vs Castle?
|
| I just noticed .vikings at Lugnet. ...But shouldn't Vikings be a subgroup of Castle? (in much the same way as Ninja) Maybe that's just my inexperienced logic talking though, so please don't flame me if there is some heated reason I'm unaware of as (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Its a Completely New Castle (was Re: Legend set of Royal Knight's Castle)
|
| (...) Not to bring up an old debate, but: They never really tried to sell the Legends, if you put the guarded inn in a decent box (what were they thinking with a black and white one?) and put it on a shelf next to a thrown together model like this (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
|
