 | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Tore Eriksson
| | | | (...) You mean something like: 0 Brick 2 x 4 0 Name: 3001.dat 0 INTERIOR BEGIN 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 16 box5.dat 4 (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Chuck Sommerville
| | | | | | (...) colour < 47) ), interior can be skipped. Of course you mean above the lower edge relative to the parts current orientation. That would require taking the transformation matrix into account. -Chuck (24 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Tore Eriksson
| | | | | | | (...) Argh! Didn't think of that... :o/ /Tore (24 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Lars C. Hassing
| | | | | Tore Eriksson wrote... (...) Uh, maybe. However, if you have a 2x2 brick on top of the 2x4, how do you leave out only half the TOP section? Or you wouldn't? Maybe parts should be broken into subparts for analysis? I think the main problem is, that (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Chuck Sommerville
| | | | | | (...) In this case you could leave out the interior of the 2x2, but you must use the entire top of the 4x4. In the case of solid wall like structures, however, it could reduce 90% of the blocks to no interiour, and no studs. -Chuck (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: L3PLiTE? —Leonardo Zide
| | | | | (...) I think this is a little too much for the task, you don't need to try to remove the interior too, it won't make a big difference. Think of a 2x2 plate, if you can remove the stud4, you're saving 48 quads, 64 lines and 32 optional lines while (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
