|
|
 | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| My thought was that the smoothing could be turned on and off, as appropriate. That would require metastatements in the parts files. Extra metastatements will slow down processing, but not by very much. They will also increase file size, but again, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| Instead of shoving all these metastatements into files, maybe a file conversion utility (DAT -> POV) should keep an INI file that records which parts can be processed in this way, and which cannot. I'm basing this suggestion on the assumption that (...) (23 years ago, 22-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| (...) Wow! Yes, I'd say it's definitely of interest! At least it is to me. :) (...) Heck yeah! Would there be any point to discussing possible meta-statements, to turn smoothing on and off for different sections of part files? Steve (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| (...) Another idea is to choose different angles depending on how long the edges are next to that angle. For longer edges, a smaller bend is more likely to be a real crease. I used to use this sort of heuristic in edge detection image processing (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| Lothar Teichert wrote... (...) Hi and welcome Lothar, Yes, I think it is worth to ask him :-) What a brilliant idea. I had completely forgotten about the smooth_triangle. The one example you provide looks very nice. Do you have more examples? Do you (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
