 | | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville wrote... (...) Good idea, I have thought of it myself too :-) But I have postponed the implementation because I was hoping for an integration of LGEO and L3P: the effort writing POV replacements for LDraw parts naturally belongs in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
George GeoMan wrote... (...) The good thing about L3P: it is INDEPENDENT of part updates. The not so good thing about L3P: some rounded parts look egdy/angular. /Lars (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Car- version 2 (was Re: sports car)
|
|
(...) Well, I raised the steering wheel one plate and amputated my driver at the knees so that he'd fit: (URL) I should change the color of the upholstery and the color of the driver's shirt so he stands out better. Any suggestions? --Bram (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New White Tiger Mecha")
|
|
(...) That'd be great (seems like L3P files just keeping getting bigger, though :) Lars, have you discussed anything with Lutz about using LGEO? --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) If it makes renderings better, POV files smaller, and doesn't take a lot of effort on my part, how could I not be interested? Please continue your efforts! --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
