 | | Re: bendable track —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | (...) Hi Willy, Could you please translate this for me? I suspect that you are saying, yes, we can resolve this by personal email? Thanks, Kevin (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: bendable track —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) Hi Kevin, correct. It's easier to work this out in our mothertongue. If there are problems we get back to you. Just wondering: Is there progress in "spouse" bendables with treads? w. (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: bendable track —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Hi Willy, "Spouse" bendables with treads? I'm not even married! LOL! I do not recognize the topic you are asking about. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: bendable track —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) Upps! Looks like there is a gap in communication. Don started writing code which would allow using "bendable" and "band" constraints together. A first result can be seen in STRING_HOSE + STRING_BAND at: (URL) SYNTH BEGIN STRING_BAND 19 0 SYNTH (...) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: bendable track —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Hi Willy, Thanks for the explanation. I've never touched the STRING_BAND synthesis, so we'll have to let Don speak to this. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: bendable track —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, about that... I guess Willy and I were both thinking at some point that maybe bands and hoses aren't really so different that they require two distinct paths through the lsynth code. So we did a quick and dirty experiment with the (...) (15 years ago, 17-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| | | | |
