|
Ryan wrote:
> One thing that I just thought of as I was making a set is that we also ought to
> have a submodel for hoses, just like we do for minifigs, that way all those
> hose sections are in their own file. We could name it hose1.dat, hose2.dat,
> etc.
> I think that this is a good idea because if someone's viewing a model in
> Ledit, they aren't going to want to page down through all those extra line that
> could be stored in another file.
>
> Ryan
Yes. All hoses and such like should be in a submodel.
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread: ![OMR Filenaming Standard Change? -Tim Courtney (15-Jan-00 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change? -Ryan Dennett (15-Jan-00 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change? -Ryan Dennett (23-Jan-00 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|