To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 702
701  |  703
Subject: 
Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 02:43:30 GMT
Viewed: 
913 times
  
One thing that I just thought of as I was making a set is that we also ought to
have a submodel for hoses, just like we do for minifigs, that way all those
hose sections are in their own file. We could name it hose1.dat, hose2.dat,
etc.
I think that this is a good idea because if someone's viewing a  model in
Ledit, they aren't going to want to page down through all those extra line that
could be stored in another file.

Ryan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
 
(...) Yes. All hoses and such like should be in a submodel. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
 
In some recent discussion with Ryan Dennett on creating some resources for the OMR, he brought up what he felt was a discrepancy in the file naming convention. We discussed this and felt it appropriate to approach the group to see if 1) we should go (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR