Subject:
|
Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:09:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16500 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Roland Melkert wrote:
> > About the >=30000 range, most current applications only allow upto 511 or 1023
> > for 'normal color numbers'. There are also some (unofficial?) reserved hex
> > spaces for encoded rgb values (#02000000..#03FFFFFF and 04000000..#07FFFFFF).
> >
> > Taking this into account I would also suggest using a hex range for these lc
> > core colors, so the color decoder code in any program can identify them a such
> > e.g (#400..#EFF (1024..3839)).
>
> This can be done with the caveat that we start with something like say 2001 or
> 3001 in order to preserve the original LEGO numbering starting from 1 to 300.
> for 2001 the TLG color number would be "#7D1". Correct?
>
> w.
Indeed, basically it doesn't matter what range you use. I just wanted to point
out that 'other' ranges are rounded upon hexadecimal notation (due to math
advantages). So I suggested also using that for these new ldc numbers for
consistency sake.
But human wise 2015 would be more recognizable than #40F (if #400..#EFF would be
used) I guess.
I do think there should be an official 'normal' color ceiling defined by
ldraw.org though. Just like the now (unofficial) 512 ceiling.
Roland
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) This can be done with the caveat that we start with something like say 2001 or 3001 in order to preserve the original LEGO numbering starting from 1 to 300. for 2001 the TLG color number would be "#7D1". Correct? w. (15 years ago, 29-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
