Subject:
|
Re: LDraw All-In-One-Installer - Seeking permission from software programmers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:57:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3341 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I can't legally agree to that, and it's likely that a large percentage of the
> other authors can't either. The thing is, I'm not the sole author of LDView,
> and never have been. LDView has always included code written by friends of mine
> from college, and additionally it has contained 3rd-party libraries for some
> time now (libpng, zlib, unzip32, and boost in the Windows version). It also
> contains code written by Lars C. Hassing, and code that Lars got from somewhere.
> Finally, the QT version contains quite a bit of code written by Peter Bartfai
> (the maintainer of LDView's QT port), and of course contains QT itself, but that
> wouldn't come into play here if I restricted my "permission" to the Windows
> version.
>
> Now, most of this 3rd-party code is included under permissive licenses. (All of
> it is if you consider GPL V2 to be permissive.) But it doesn't meet the
> requirements of your form. There is good news, though. Your form should be
> totally unnecessary for GPL-licensed software. The GPL itself gives you
> everything you need, as long as you make an archive of the source code somewhere
> and provide instructions in the all-in-one installer for obtaining that source
> code.
>
> --Travis
I take it the latest version of LDVIEW is under the GPL?
Ahui
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
