|
|
 | | Very hard to find ldconfig.ldr
|
| Before I found the direct link to (URL) here on a lugnet discusion, I searched for ldconfig.ldr at ldraw.org for quite a long time without succeess. I tried the Search function, entering ldconfig.ldr. It came up with: "Downloads: no downloads (...) (18 years ago, 26-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
| (...) And it was really worth the effort! A funny story/scenery with a different use of the model. Hopefully the two guys succeeded without getting two wet. And thanks for the links. I will dive through it and will see, what I can learn next... (...) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
| | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
| (...) At last, it's finished! It can be found here: (URL) (18 years ago, 5-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
| (...) Which may or may not be an issue. It's irrelevant if you're just editing existing lines, but if you add new ones, vi will add them in the file-native format (CRLF for a DOS file), while emacs will add them in the machine-native format. Dan (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
| (...) You have my pity ;) (...) I think it leaves them alone. Certainly I've never had any troubles with it converting one way or the other before. If you edit a Windows text file on a UNIX emacs it will show the extra ^R (or whichever is unused on (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
