 | | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) I agree. Posted in Mar 2006 this was not a re-write for CA-purposes, but an improvement and BFC addition. The original author still deserves credit. Header edited . Chris (18 years ago, 31-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | RE: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
If I remember correctly, Guy's file uses a lot more primitives, etc, etc, etc than the original, so I would say add the credit to the file on the Tracker. Can the admins do this with a header edit? (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Use John's original work. Or add a credit for John to the new file. Steve (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) We've got an affirmation from John Jensen for 2951.dat - Technic Bucket 10 x 8 but it looks like Guy Vivan was faster! The rewrite is already on the PT: (URL) and just needs to certified by the admins. Which action should be taken?? w. (18 years ago, 30-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Submitted to PT admin (18 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org is temporarely LDraw.org is temporarily not available
|
|
Hi, you might wonder why LDraw.org is currently showing just a blank page. We were upgrading to Postnuke .763 to support the new Postnuke theme templating engine when something went the wrong way. We are currently working to fix the problem and (...) (18 years ago, 19-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | LSC adopts "de-facto" BFC standard as the draft standard
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has adopted the "de-facto" Back Face Culling (BFC) standard ((URL) as their draft standard. We are now working on clarifying a few minor ambiguities in the draft standard so that it can be ratified as the official (...) (18 years ago, 15-Oct-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I'm pleased to announce the relaunch of LDraw.org's MOTM/SOTM contest. Moving the curatorship has caused some trouble, but now we are back on track and open submissions to MOTM/SOTM once again. Have a look at: (URL) the rules and submit you model or (...) (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Ratification
|
|
Since the motion to move the LSC elections has been posted (URL) and publicly discussed, and since by peoples' silence, there appear to be no more lingering objections, the Steering Committee hereby calls for a community vote to ratify the motion (...) (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
LOL, I think it'll be totally free from bugs before I have even time to THINK about making new parts ;) Anyways, it's a relief that I don't have to worry about this too at the moment... CYA sometime next summer Cheers NB (18 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
