data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f21/51f217bb6cbbf92db8ab373fed6deaea207e93a9" alt="" | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Hmm. Where did that figure come from? I've been using 1 LDU = .4mm for quite awhile now... (...) heh. Don't be *too* sure about that, I seem to remember seeing some early evidence about measurements in English units. But it's a vague memory, I (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f21/51f217bb6cbbf92db8ab373fed6deaea207e93a9" alt="" | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) some links about this topic: (URL) I use paul's figures: 1 LDU = 0.015625 inch = 0.396875 mm (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f21/51f217bb6cbbf92db8ab373fed6deaea207e93a9" alt="" | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Well, yes, and no. The bricks are not nearly as precise as the molds, but the dimensional tolerances for parts must certainly be a lot tighter than the difference between 1/64" and 0.4 mm. That difference is almost a full percent, so there is (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f21/51f217bb6cbbf92db8ab373fed6deaea207e93a9" alt="" | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Well, far be it from me to argue with Science. ;) Steve (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|