To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3178
3177  |  3179
Subject: 
Re: License Intent
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:52:42 GMT
Viewed: 
3336 times
  
Orion Pobursky wrote:

So exactly how would someone release a rendering in
complience with open source?

That depends on the license on the LDraw Parts Library
and the LDraw file for the model/scene.

The DAT file associated with the render is not subject to
the open source rules (since it is not a derivative work
but merely references the library as a tool)

Exactly.

so you can't force release of the DAT code.

But since the _rendering_ of the DAT file _is_ a derivative
work of the LDraw Parts Library, distributing the rendering
may change the game.

Assuming that the LDraw Parts Library is under a:

a) GPL or LGPL style license, the "viral effect" of the
    license means that those who get the rendering also
    should get (access to) the source for the DAT file and
    the relevant parts of the LDraw Parts Library.

b) BSD style license, there is no obligation to distribute
    any source files with the rendering.

Jacob
--
»Forøvrigt mener jeg at PTO skal begynde at skrive på en
grundlovstale.«                     -- Niels Elgaard Larsen



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: License Intent
 
(...) Perhaps the book authors could share some insight on this, because there are many books out there containing renderings. What legal hoops did they jump through in order to publish? Don (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: License Intent
 
(...) Actually I beliee that this is the exact case where the LGPL differes from the GPL. Since the Parts 'library' will only be referecned as a library, I think that (if the LGPL were used on it,) it's license wouldn't pollute the license of the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: License Intent
 
(...) So exactly how would someone release a rendering in complience with open source ? The DAT file associated with the render is not subject to the open source rules (since it is not a derivative work but merely references the library as a tool) (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR