 | | Re: License Intent —Peter Howkins
|
| | | (...) <snip> I've taken the chance to read the threads mentioned earlier in this thread. And I've made a version of the license (based on the previous Steve Bliss version) that handles both author->ldraw.org requirements and author->EndUser (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: License Intent —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote: (snip) I need to go back through the post and read it more carefully before I respond in depth. However, quickly... Thanks for sharing another license draft, but we really *really* would like to get (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: License Intent —Peter Howkins
|
| | | | (...) The license draft included in my post was merely done to demonstrate that the language needed to license the people described is possible. I've condensed most of my points, and some new ones, into a new post that I've posted in reply to the (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
