 | | Re: library license —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) Good point. Both of them are fine with me. I think I prefer the Attribution-ShareAlike license, if I have to make a choice between the two. It seems like if would be a good idea, if the parts library maintainers set up a poll among the parts (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: library license —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Would it simplify things for part authors who don't care about the license to declare their parts to be public domain? Because I really don't want to be bothered wrestling over a license for the handful of files I had anything to do with. Don (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: library license —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | (...) Yes. Except that "public domain" is a concept that doesn't exist outside USA. (...) If you send Steve Bliss an e-mail, where you tell him that he (as LDraw.org Parts Library Head Honcho) is free to choose which license your parts files are (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
