 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | (...) If you feel that POV rendering gives too many degrees of freedom, why not define MOTM as L3LAB, Ortographic, renderings. Then there's no discussion of landscape, sky, Anton Raves' parts, etc. etc. L3LAB rendering also shows the construction of (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) limit the submissions from those who are unwilling/unable to install the specified program on their machine. This is why I liked Larry's idea to submit the DAT code instead and to have the contest coordinator do the renders. This way, if the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I think you're signing yourself up for a lot of work but it's a terrifically nifty idea! (20 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Nah, the work is easily automated. -Orion (20 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
