 | | Re: Numbers Report —Franklin W. Cain
| | | | (...) Steve, If I recall correctly, this is not a problem, because the Tracker says that a file has "[x] subfile(s) isn't/aren't certified" if it has *any* subfiles (including primitives) that are *not* fully, totally, 100% certified... Thanks, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Numbers Report —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Actually, I'm thinking of the reverse situation - the subfile is certified, but the parent file is not certified. In this case, it would be sloppy to release the subfile before the part file is released. Look at the horse files for an example (...) (23 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Numbers Report —Franklin W. Cain
| | | | | (...) Actually, I'd *much* prefer this response to the alternate (i.e., better this than releasing the "main" file before its subfiles). To be honest, I see no problem with pre-emptively releasing a "not yet used" subfile before its "main" file. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Numbers Report —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Well, yes. No argument there. (...) And what if, after the subfile is pre-emptively released, we realize that the file is totally wrong, and must be scrapped? Or some other thing comes up? It's just sloppy to put out unused files, and I don't (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
