 | | [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ —Steve Bliss
| | | | I took the current information available from the Parts Tracker, and the recent discussions in this group, and put together a quick FAQ page about reviewing parts. Please let me know what you think! I will be happy to receive any and all Edits, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ —Orion Pobursky
| | | | | Based on this FAQ, I get the notion that BFC is required not optional. Maybe a rewording is in order. Something like: What should I look for when I review a part? . . . . Check the Part for correct BFC (if the part is intended to be BFC complient) (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Ooo, I didn't realize that. Thanks for pointing it out. (...) Is it better now? (URL) Now, we just need a "Part Author's Guide to BFC Compliance" page... Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
